Interested in a PLAGIARISM-FREE paper based on these particular instructions?...with 100% confidentiality?

Order Now

In 2010 the Supreme Court’s novel and controversial interpretation of the 2nd Amendment greatly limited government’s power to restrict gun possession. The case McDonald v. Chicago sparked widespread debate across the political and legal community, some of which is expressed in the assigned articles you read for this discussion. Read the summary of McDonald v. Chicago, then choose and read two articles pertaining to the McDonald v Chicago case from the Recommended Resources for POL303 PDF file. Write a detailed critique of these articles. Respond to this 3-part question in your initial post: Explain the articles’ positions and arguments. Identify and analyze a strength and a weakness in the authors’ analyses or conclusions (from your perspective). Explain your reasons for viewing each point as either a strength or a weakness. Describe how the articles affect your evaluation of the Court’s decision in McDonald v. Chicago and explain why. Your initial post should be at least 250 words in length. Support your claims with examples from the required material(s) and/or other scholarly resources, and properly cite any references. Respond to at least two of your classmates’ posts by Day 7 in at least 100 words. Respond to someone whose perspective on “the right to bear arms” differs from yours.

In 2010 the Supreme Court’s novel and controversial interpretation of the 2nd Amendment greatly limited government’s power to restrict gun possession. The case McDonald v. Chicago sparked widespread debate across the political and legal community, some of which is expressed in the assigned articles you read for this discussion.  Read the summary of McDonald v. Chicago, then choose and read two articles pertaining to the McDonald v Chicago case from the Recommended Resources for POL303 PDF file.

Write a detailed critique of these articles. Respond to this 3-part question in your initial post:

    Explain the articles' positions and arguments.
    Identify and analyze a strength and a weakness in the authors' analyses or conclusions (from your perspective). Explain your reasons for viewing each point as either a strength or a weakness.
    Describe how the articles affect your evaluation of the Court’s decision in McDonald v. Chicago and explain why.


Your initial post should be at least 250 words in length. Support your claims with examples from the required material(s) and/or other scholarly resources, and properly cite any references. Respond to at least two of your classmates’ posts by Day 7 in at least 100 words. Respond to someone whose perspective on “the right to bear arms” differs from yours.

Interested in a PLAGIARISM-FREE paper based on these particular instructions?...with 100% confidentiality?

Order Now